Archive for the 'News Releases' Category

American Lung Association Applauds New Sulfur Dioxide Health Standard

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

American Lung Association Applauds New Sulfur Dioxide Health Standard 

‘Standard offers the promise of real protection’


Statement of Charles D. Connor, American Lung Association President and CEO:


Washington, D.C. (June 3, 2010)
The American Lung Association applauds the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the new National Ambient Air Quality Standard for sulfur dioxide, the first strengthening of the limits on this dangerous air pollutant in nearly four decades.  For the first time, this standard will help curtail the bursts of this noxious gas that spew into communities living next to some of our nation’s oldest, dirtiest polluters, including coal-fired power plants. This standard offers the promise of real protection to the people who have breathed these fumes for far too long.

Sulfur dioxide threatens our health in many ways.  Sulfur dioxide tightens the airways, making it harder for people with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other lung diseases to breathe. It worsens coughing and wheezing and increases asthma attacks. Breathing sulfur dioxide sends people with lung diseases to the emergency department or the hospital for breathing problems.   Sulfur dioxide  gas changes into deadly particles in the atmosphere and is linked to thousands of premature deaths. EPA estimates that this tighter standard will save 2,300 to 5,900 early deaths each year,

The national air quality standard sets the official limits on how much of this pollutant can be in the air.  The standards drive the cleanup of the sources of these pollutants in communities across the country. In this case, the standard will help protect some of the communities located closest to coal-fired power plants, industrial boilers, petroleum refineries, metal processing plants and diesel exhaust.

With today’s action, EPA has wisely chosen to use an array of tools to identify the communities with dangerous levels of sulfur dioxide.  Communities will have to not only place new monitors, but do computer modeling to identify where problems may exist.  Modeling here is an appropriate and welcome supplement to monitoring and can help ensure that we can better protect the people living nearest to these big polluters.

We also appreciate EPA’s decision to make sure that every community is “classified.”  In the past, communities without adequate monitoring information could avoid having to clean up because they fit in the “unclassified” category. For the first time, EPA is requiring that these communities use the modeling and monitoring data to show that they are either meeting or failing to meet the standard.  This change is a subtle, but fundamental strengthening of the protections for people living in the communities, because it means the problems they face must be recognized and addressed.

Statement of the American Lung Association on EPA’s Revised Standards for Nitrogen Dioxide

Monday, January 25th, 2010
Statement of Charles D. Connor, American Lung Association President and CEO

Washington, D.C. (January 25, 2010)—

Today the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced the first revision to the national air quality standard for nitrogen dioxide since 1971, including the first network of roadside monitors for any of the motor vehicle pollutants.

We are pleased that EPA has finally strengthened protection against this toxic pollutant, with a new standard that limits peak one-hour levels of nitrogen dioxide. EPA’s step means that, in the future, millions of people will not have to breathe the most dangerous concentrations of this noxious gas. Nitrogen dioxide makes people cough and wheeze and inflames the tissues of the lungs. Nitrogen dioxide triggers asthma attacks and increases the likelihood asthma suffers will have to rush to the emergency department or be admitted to the hospital. Nitrogen dioxide increases the likelihood of catching lung infections such as influenza.

We support the network of nitrogen dioxide monitors located near highways.  We hope this will only be the beginning of what is truly needed—a comprehensive, multipollutant network that will routinely gather information along our highways, the place in every community that has some of the highest levels of the most dangerous pollutants.

But after waiting 38 years, we had frankly hoped for a stronger, more protective standard.  Their decision allows areas to have nitrogen dioxide concentrations that remain hazardous to the millions of people who will have to breathe them.  Their final decision, unlike their proposal of last summer, allows twice as many days when nitrogen dioxide will spike to dangerous levels.  Unfortunately, that burden is likely to fall hardest on those who can least bear it—children, older adults, people with lung disease, as well as people with low incomes, and communities of color.

Millions of people face higher risk from having to breathe dangerous levels of nitrogen dioxide. EPA estimated that 36 million people live near highways, railroads or ports, where they breathe air that is more polluted with nitrogen dioxide than in other parts of the county.

This month the Health Effects Institute—a research center funded by the motor vehicle industry and EPA—released an extensive review of the evidence of the threats to health from living near a highway.  An expert panel concluded that breathing the nitrogen dioxide and other pollutants from highway traffic increased the risk that a child’s asthma would get worse. Strong evidence warned that pollution from traffic may even increase the risk that children could develop asthma, or worsen their lungs’ ability to function.  For older adults and people with cardiovascular disease, the evidence pointed to another dire threat—living near a highway may increase the risk of early death.

Neighborhoods near major highways are often home to people with lower incomes, as well as communities of color. Many busy highways pass through dense urban neighborhoods or near schools.  Those communities often have higher prevalence of lung disease, putting them at even greater risk from breathing traffic exhaust.  The Institute’s report estimated that 30 to 45 percent of people living in large North American cities live close enough to highways to breathe the dangerous pollutants there.

We face a challenge to reduce the pollution that our friends and neighbors must breathe. Today’s action is a good first step.  The American Lung Association will watch the new monitoring data closely.  We will continue to urge EPA to provide greater protection when the Agency reviews this standard again in five years.

American Lung Association Welcomes Proposed Sulfur Dioxide Health Standard

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

(November 17, 2009)–Statement of Charles D. Connor, American Lung Association President and CEO
Today the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed new limits on the toxic air pollutant sulfur dioxide in the outdoor air.  This health standard has not been revised since 1971.  The American Lung Association welcomes this long overdue action and urges EPA to set a standard at a level that truly protects public health.  Inhaling sulfur dioxide (SO2) makes it hard for people with asthma to breathe. High levels of SO2 force people to the emergency room and to hospitals because they have trouble breathing.
EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson proposed a new national air quality standard to limit one-hour levels of sulfur dioxide gas, which would offer more protection from short spikes in SO2 than the current annual or 24-hour standards provide.  This standard targets the repeated spikes of this dangerous gas that threaten the health of millions. We at the American Lung Association applaud her recommendation. If EPA adopts a standard that protects the health of the public, communities with the highest SO2 levels will have to clean up their pollution.  The American Lung Association recommends EPA adopt the most protective level, 50 parts per billion, under consideration.
The American Lung Association had taken legal steps in the past to push EPA to protect against these spikes in sulfur dioxide pollution, so we are pleased that EPA has now begun to do so.  Sources, such as coal-fired power plants, industrial facilities, and ports, which pollute the air in the communities where they operate need to be cleaned up.  Cleaner, healthier air will benefit the lives and health of millions of people.
Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a gas composed of sulfur and oxygen. Spikes in SO2 occur all too frequently, particularly in areas near coal-fired power plants. SO2 forms when sulfur-containing fuel such as coal, oil, or diesel is burned.  Sulfur dioxide also converts in the atmosphere to sulfates, a prime component of fine particle pollution in the eastern U.S.
We urge EPA to adopt a tighter one-hour standard, and to retain its existing annual standard as well.

# # #

American Lung Association Wins Case Seeking Stronger Particulate Pollution Standards

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

February 24, 2009.  A federal appeals court today ruled that Bush-era clean air standards were deficient, sending them back to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for corrective action. (more…)

Groups Sue to Protect Americans from Smog

Tuesday, May 27th, 2008

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 27, 2008

CONTACTS:
David Baron, Earthjustice, (202) 667-4500
Carrie Martin, American Lung Association, (202) 715-3461
John Walke, Natural Resources Defense Council, (202) 289-2406
Mark Wenzler, National Parks Conservation Association, (202) 255-9013
Vickie Patton, Environmental Defense Fund, (720) 837-6239

Health, Environmental Groups Enforce the Clean Air Act to Protect Americans from Smog
EPA Science Advisor: “Willful ignorance triumphed over sound science” in setting standards

Washington, DC – Health and environmental advocates are filing suit today challenging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s refusal to adopt stronger ozone standards urged by its own scientists. (more…)

Half Measures and Compromises Are Not Good Enough

Wednesday, March 12th, 2008
Statement of Bernadette Toomey
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Lung Association
March 12, 2008

Washington, DC (March 12, 2008). Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced a critical tightening of the health-based National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone. We wish we could be happier about this decision, but we cannot. The standard announced today, although an improvement, falls far short of the requirements of the Clean Air Act. We are unable to celebrate half measures when the risks are so evident, when the science and the scientists are so united about what is needed and when the missed opportunity means that thousands will suffer more and die sooner than they should. Furthermore, we reject the suggestions made by the Administrator to weaken and undermine the Clean Air Act itself. Coming from the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, such suggestions are truly outrageous. (more…)

Smog Showdown March 12, 2008: EPA to Announce Final Revisions to the Smog Standards

Thursday, March 6th, 2008

It’s coming down to the wire. What’s literally at stake is the quality of the air we breathe.

The U.S. EPA is on the verge of deciding if national health standards for smog should be made tougher. (more…)

Members of Congress Tell EPA to Limit Smog Pollution

Tuesday, October 2nd, 2007

A broad, bipartisan coalition of members of the U.S. House of Representatives sent a letter October 2, 2007 to the Environmental Protection Agency calling for strong limits on smog pollution. (more…)

Statement of ALA on EPA Proposal for Ozone NAAQS, June 21, 2007

Thursday, June 21st, 2007

Statement of Norman Edelman, MD
Chief Medical Officer
American Lung Association
June 21, 2007

The proposed revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone smog announced today by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are a step toward cleaner air.  While the American Lung Association is pleased that the EPA is calling for tighter standards, the agency’s plan falls short of the goal recommended by its own scientific experts.  We are particularly concerned that the EPA has left the door open to choosing options that are simply not acceptable.  We have reason to be concerned.  (more…)

Smog Showdown! — June 14, 2007

Wednesday, June 13th, 2007

It’s big polluters versus health and science –  And an EPA decision hangs in the balance (more…)