Health Science or Political Science?

Conflict Over How Much Particle Pollution is Safe to Breathe

In terms of health science, it’s a no-brainer: There’s growing scientific consensus that the Environmental Protection Agency should set much tougher limits for national health standards for particle pollution. That’s the published view of EPA’s career scientists, as well as EPA’s official outside science advisors.

These standards set the goal for clean air for the entire nation. Much tighter standards are needed because thousands of people – according to EPA’s own calculation – are dying prematurely under the current standards, set in 1997.

EPA Administrator Steve Johnson is under a court agreement to make a preliminary decision by December 20, but big polluters are applying their lobbying muscle to prevent standards that would mean additional cleanup.

Will Administrator Johnson be swayed by health science – or political science?

The attached fact sheets provide background information and analysis.

Attachments

12-05 Scientists Letter
final-scientists-letter-12.pdf
Letter of 100+ Scientists to EPA
New Science Shows Effects Below Current Standards
science-summary-final-1.doc
Fact Sheet 6/27/05
Air Quality Standard Setting Process
standard-setting-process-f-1.doc
Backgrounder 6/27/05
The Choices EPA Faces Over the Particulate Matter Standard
standards-options-1215051.pdf
Fact Sheet on options under consideration
Backgrounder: What is Particulate Matter?
what-is-particulate-matter-1.doc
Backgrounder 6/27/05
Review of the Particulate Matter Standard
121505-chronology-final.pdf
Backgrounder on controversy over 1997 standards and extensive scientific review
Real Change or Paper Change?
121505-questions-final.pdf
Questions to Ask: How Health and Environmental Groups will Evaluate EPA’s Proposals
Legal and Scientific reviews: 1996-2006
121505-review-milestones.pdf
Key milestones in the review of the NAAQS
It’s More Than Just a Number
5-key-parts-to-the-pm-stan.pdf
Five Key Parts to the Standard 12/05
Deaths in 9 Cities from PM
standards-optionsphilly-da.pdf
Updated Chart Showing Comparing Risk Reductions Under Alternative Standards